|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeSpray refillsSsscat Refill |
|
|  |
| Customer Reviews: | | Average Customer Review:
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
 Ssscat refills Jun 06, 2010
I suppose this isn't the proper venue to discuss the actual Ssscat system itself, since this review is directed to the refills. As far as the refills go, there is not much to say other than they refill the system, and are the same cans you receive with the system itself. I have ordered these more than once, and interestingly, the most recent order was marked as official refills but the packaging was changed. They appeared to work all the same, so just an informational tidbit for prospective buyers. I liked the fact I was able to get these on Amazon because I went to several different Petcos/Petsmarts and had trouble finding them.
 cannot use, as discharger head malfunctioned within 2 months Apr 17, 2010
Unfortunately, the discharger head (shipped before the refills were shipped) stopped working within two months. Battery changes had no effect. Very disappointed.
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
Great when it works, but not nearly enough sprays Feb 16, 2010
When this product works, it is amazing at keeping our naughty cats off of countertops, tables, etc. However, the refill is supposed to provide something like 150+ sprays, and our canisters have consistently run out after maybe 50-75 sprays. I have heard that some people use cans of compressed air from radio shack or other stores instead of these pricey refills.
3 of 3 found the following review helpful:
 Way too expensive Oct 06, 2009
Get the large size dust off can from Radio Shack. Works fine. Half the price. Twice the contents.
The ssscat itself works dandy! Now Scat!
1 of 1 found the following review helpful:
SSSCAT to keep cats away Apr 03, 2009
This product works well and does scare the cats away from where you don't want them, BUT it is costly avg.$10.00 and it doesn't last long at all so I would not buy them again.
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
